Assignment 3: OKAY

A life-size human figure is installed in a gallery. It is white and soft, inviting a hug. There is a “PLEASE HUG” sign at its feet. If the visitor gives the figure a big hug, squeezing it tightly for a couple of seconds, it will whisper into his/her ear “Okay, I’ll sign the Kyoto Treaty” or a similar promise. More hugging will elicit more promises. These would be randomly selected from a library in which prerecorded promises by persons in the public sphere (such as “Okay, I won’t drill in Alaska”) will be mixed with recordings of personal promises made by individuals in the gallery.
The visitor will be invited to whisper a promise of his/her own into the figure’s ear. This promise will be recorded and stored in the library of promises the figure in the gallery will whisper in response to the hug.

An algorithm of reciprocity is created when visitors feel held to their promise by the future gallery visitors. The personal connection that is created by the tangibility of the hug transfers the “good will” from visitor to visitor in a intimate, personable way, eliciting earnest promises and inspiring ideas of change.
The blank figure starts a chain of small changes made on a local level by the gallery visitors, which illustrates a process bottom-up growth.
The personal promises recorded in the gallery accumulate, and their number drowns out the pre-recorded “wish” promises.

Many studies show that we can produce feelings and affect our thoughts by simply reenacting their bodily expressions:

"Every interaction has an emotional subtext. Along with whatever else we are doing, we can make each other feel a little better, or a lot worse.
The mechanism of emotional contagion rests on two psychological facts. First, psychologists have learned that our facial and physical expressions affect our mood. If you make a sad face for a prolonged time you will experience both emotional and physiological changes in effect making you feel sad. The second piece of the puzzle comes from the fact that humans mimic. Again, this has been demonstrated in laboratory studies. If you smile at people they will tend to mimic and reflexively smile back. This will in turn affect their mood.

The amygdala (an almond-shaped area in the midbrain that acts as a radar for the brain, calling attention to whatever might be new, puzzling, or important to learn more about. The amygdala operates the brain's early warning system, scanning everything that happens, ever vigilant for emotionally salient events) extracts emotional meaning from the nonverbal message, whether it be a scowl, a sudden change of posture, or a shift in tone of voice–even microseconds before we yet know what we are looking at. Though the amygdala has an exquisite sensitivity for such messages, its wiring provides no direct access to the centers for speech; in this sense the amygdala is, literally, speechless. When we register a feeling, signals from our brain circuits, instead of alerting the verbal areas, where words can express what we know, mimic that emotion in our own bodies." (from Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships, written by Daniel Goleman)


Other studies suggest that hugs trigger the release of a neurochemical which is responsible for feelings of care and love (oxytocin), and research on autism shows that physical pressure (simulating the reception of a hug) has a comforting effect on humans and animals. Studies on autism also show that we store specific physicla body states and non-verbal memories that trigger the feelings associated with these body states.

"It is now well-established that both animals and humans show health benefits from social contact (e.g., House, Umberson, & Landis, 1988). Positive physical contact in the form of touching, hugging, cuddling, and the like is known to release oxytocin." (cf. Ryff & Singer, 1998).
"What doyletics predicts about autistic children is that they will not store a memory of a tactile experience once they store it as a conceptual memory. Thus the boy in the story above remembers the PKU shot and feels angry because he recovers the physical body states of anger that he had previously stored as physical body states long before he received the shot. What he doesn't and cannot ever recover is the specific physical body state or pain he felt in his foot or anywhere else in his body while the doctor administered the shot. If his heart had sped up during the PKU shot episode, it would not speed up as he talked to his doctor at eleven years old. Instead, he would merely remember the location of the shot and would feel the anger that he had felt back then, which was an internal physical body state that he had stored earlier." (from A READER'S JOURNAL, Volume 1: Thinking in Pictures by Temple Grandin And Other Reports from My Life with Autism, Book Review by Bobby Matherne ©2002).


Thus, simply the mechanics of a hug can positively affect us and predispose us to a positive reaction. We intuit this mechanism and inscribe it into this installation, even though the actual physiological reaction might be very subtle.

The same figure could be installed in several different locations around the world at the same time. The promises from all the different locations will be stored in a shared online database. Hugs in various locations will elicit promises from both local and remote locations.




NOTES:

I'm still considering the form of the object to be hugged. The abstracted human form is still my ideal solution, though exactly what kind of abstraction it is is still to be developed and decided. Because there are so many representations of the human body already symbolizing things in our culture, it would have to be something unique that doesn't refer to any of those symbols.

The other alternatives are to use a pillow, or a oversized stuffed animal, both things that we already understand as objects to be hugged. However they don't elicit the kind of action that I'm looking for in the interaction: a personal embrace. I like the idea of using a pillow, as a sort of depository of the deeply felt emotions and intimate, personal utterings. I will probably make a version of this piece that will use a pillow or pillows on horizontal surface that are meant to be squeezed or hugged. In this case they would not necessarily elicit promises, but just personal things entrusted to it by the previous viewer/user.
The oversized stuffed animal, on the other hand, is also a slightly different idea, it will inevitably introduce meaning, as an object that already exists in our culture and carries cultural associations. I like the idea of making the viewer feel like a child, both size-wise and emotinally-wise. I also like the absurdity or creating a huge stuffed animal, and the fact that it already is an object inscribed with agency.